Page 89 - English_F5
P. 89

English




           DID YOU   ?
              KNOW

            In the above conversation, Asha and Agnes discuss the differences in interpreting
            information from spontaneous and non-spontaneous conversations. They highlight
            that, in spontaneous conversations, quick thinking and reliance on context and non-
        FOR ONLINE READING ONLY
            verbal cues are crucial. On the other hand, non-spontaneous conversations provide
            more time for analysis and research. They also acknowledge the importance of
            intuition in decoding messages on the spot and the opportunity for clarification in
            non-spontaneous conversations. Cultural and dialectical differences are recognised
            as factors requiring  open-mindedness  and  adaptability  in  interpretation.  They
            touch on the influence of biases on interpretation and stress the need for self-
            awareness and objectivity. Both agree that interpreting information is a skill that
            develops through practice and engagement and by fostering better understanding
            and connection with others.



          (e) How do planned conversations differ from rehearsed conversations and what are
              the key factors that enable them to flow naturally and efficiently?

          (f)  Read the following news article and summarise its main points.


                    SA orders German firm SAP to pay $26m earned ‘corruptly’
          South Africa’s special tribunal has ordered German multinational company SAP to
          pay back 500m rand ($26m; £20m) that the firm reportedly earned through corrupt
          contracts.

          The country’s anti-corruption body says that the contracts - signed between SAP and
          the public power company Eskom - did not comply with public finance management
          laws, resulting in “fruitless and wasteful expenditures” for Eskom.

          The two contracts were entered between 2013 and 2016 and were valued at $58m.
          The payment order follows a settlement agreement between SAP and the anti-corruption
          agency Special Investigating Unit (SIU).

          The Special  Tribunal last week upheld the settlement  and termed the contracts
          “constitutionally invalid.”

          SIU said on Monday that the payment was part of efforts “to recover financial losses
          suffered by state institutions due to negligence or corruption.”

          “The settlement agreement does not absolve SAP or any implicated party from possible
          prosecution.”
          SAP is required to remit the payment to SIU within seven days.



             Form      Five                       80         Tanzania Institute of Education (TIE)



                                                                                          24/06/2024   22:26
   ENGLISH FORM 5.indd   80                                                               24/06/2024   22:26
   ENGLISH FORM 5.indd   80
   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94