Page 128 - English_F5

English

As Ikupa relayed the interpreted statement to the delegates from Lande, confusion
and frustration erupted in the room. It is at this moment she realised that the real
interpretation of the phrase that was meant to express willingness to negotiate was
mistakenly interpreted as a direct challenge.

Misinterpretations continued as tensions escalated. Attempts to clarify only impaired the
situation, as accusations of deliberate mistranslation flew between delegates. Despite
FOR ONLINE READING ONLY
Ikupa’s efforts to rectify the misunderstanding, the damage had already been done.
The diplomatic conference, once filled with hope for productive dialogue and cooperation,
descended into chaos. With trust shattered and communication breakdowns irreversible,
the meeting ended abruptly, leaving the delegates to return to their respective countries
with unresolved issues and increased tension and mistrust.

As the delegates filed out of the conference hall, their faces were covered with frustration
and disappointment. Ikupa vowed to redouble her efforts in pursuit of linguistic
precision and cultural sensitivity. For in the world of diplomacy, where words held the
power to shape destinies, there could be no room for error.

Questions

1. What role did Ikupa, the interpreter, play in the breakdown of communication
during the diplomatic conference? How did her interpretation impact the outcome
of the meeting?
2. How might cultural differences and linguistic differences have contributed to the
misinterpretation? What strategies could Ikupa have employed to navigate these
challenges more effectively?

3. Reflecting on Ikupa’s experience, what ethical considerations come into play for
interpreters when interpreting statements in high-stakes diplomatic settings? How
can interpreters balance the pressure for accuracy with the potential consequences
of misinterpretation?

4. What could the delegates from both Kango and Lenda have done differently to
prevent or mitigate the breakdown of the meeting? How important are effective
communication and mutual understanding in diplomatic negotiations?
5. Considering the aftermath of the failed diplomatic conference, what lessons
can be learnt about the importance of skilled interpretation, cross-cultural
communication, and conflict resolution in international relations? How might
future conferences be approached to avoid similar misunderstandings?

Tanzania Institute of Education (TIE) 119 Form Five

24/06/2024 22:26
ENGLISH FORM 5.indd 119 24/06/2024 22:26
ENGLISH FORM 5.indd 119